How the AEXI Aggregator Works: One Search, 58 Providers

Liquidity is fragmented, and that is the whole problem in one sentence. ETH to USDC sits on Uniswap, SushiSwap, Balancer, Curve and a dozen other pools, each quoting a slightly different price after fees.

Swap on one DEX and you are stuck with that pool's number. An aggregator queries the field at once and routes your order through the combination that nets the most after every cost.

Two route engines do the work. LI.FI covers 69 networks and 6,968 tokens; NEAR Intents adds 16 networks and 123 tokens — 85 networks and 7,000+ tokens combined.

Across those engines, AEXI evaluates 58 providers in real time: aggregators like 1inch, ParaSwap and 0x, AMMs like Uniswap and SushiSwap, liquidity protocols like Balancer and Curve, and bridges such as Hop.

Each amount you enter fires parallel quotes at every reachable source, compared on three axes: amount received, total fee and execution time.

Out comes a short ranked list of routes, each with its output, gas cost and estimated duration — so the choice is yours: best price, fastest fill or lowest fee.

For large swaps, AEXI can split the order across several pools, filling each slice where the price is tightest. The combined result beats any single pool, without inflating slippage.

The whole thing stays atomic: either the full trade completes or your funds come back. No partial fills, no exposure mid-route, no stuck states.

More sources means tighter prices. For the same pair, the spread between the worst and best route is often 0.5-1% — exactly what an aggregator hands back to you.

AEXI charges no hidden markup on aggregated routes. The price you confirm is the price you get.